OPENAI MODEL FAMILY
GPT-5.6 API Models: Sol vs Terra vs Luna
Compare GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna by API price, context window, reasoning controls, tools, and task fit before choosing a model.
Available models
Open a model page from this family
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI's flagship GPT-5.6 model for complex professional work, advanced coding, reasoning, and long-running agents.
1.05M context · $4 input / $20 outputOpenAI modelGPT-5.6 Terra
The balanced GPT-5.6 tier for production workloads that need strong reasoning and tools at a lower price than Sol.
1.05M context · $2 input / $12 outputOpenAI modelGPT-5.6 Luna
The cost-sensitive GPT-5.6 tier for high-volume workloads, fast routing, extraction, and lightweight reasoning.
1.05M context · $0.20 input / $1.20 outputRead by decision
How to choose a GPT-5.6 API model
Start with the smallest model likely to meet the workload. Compare it with one higher-capability candidate on the same tasks, then choose by accepted-result quality, latency, reliability, and total cost.
- Choose Sol for the hardest coding, research and long-running professional workflows.
- Choose Terra when quality still matters but the workload needs a lower unit cost.
- Choose Luna for classification, extraction, routing and other high-volume work after task-specific evaluation.
GPT-5.6 API capabilities
- Text and image input with text output across the current GPT-5.6 family.
- A 1.05M context window and up to 128K output support large repositories and document sets.
- Function calling, web search, file search and computer use are published tool options.
- Reasoning can be adjusted from none to max so latency and depth can be tuned per task.
GPT-5.6 pricing and context questions
Do not compare only the headline input rate. Include output, cache reads and writes, long-context tiers, reasoning tokens, tool calls, retries, and the amount of history resent on every turn.
- Start with medium reasoning, then increase it only when the evaluation set shows a quality gain.
- Trim repeated conversation history even when the context window is large.
- Record latency, input, output, tool calls and retries per completed task—not per isolated request.
Which workloads fit GPT-5.6?
- Repository-scale coding and code review.
- Long-document synthesis with citations verified by your application.
- Tool-using agents that need structured calls and recovery logic.
- High-volume transformation and extraction on Terra or Luna.
GPT-5.6 API limits and migration risks
- A published capability does not guarantee that every LLMFly AI route exposes the same endpoint or tool.
- Large context can raise latency and cost; it is not a substitute for retrieval and context selection.
- Keep model IDs in configuration and test a fallback before production rollout.
Move from model research to a usable model ID
Open a model page above, note its provider model ID, and then use Model Plaza to confirm the ID available to your API key. Store that ID in configuration so it can be reviewed and changed without rewriting the application.
Frequently asked questions
Which GPT-5.6 API model should I use?
Start with the smallest candidate whose published capabilities match the task, then compare it with one stronger model on a representative evaluation set.
How much does the GPT-5.6 API cost?
Pricing belongs to a specific model. Open its page for provider pricing, then confirm the LLMFly AI price in Model Plaza.
What is the GPT-5.6 context window?
Context limits vary by model. Use the specific model page and catalog instead of inferring a limit from the family name.
Can I use GPT-5.6 through an OpenAI-compatible client?
Use a model marked compatible in Model Plaza and test the endpoint, streaming, tools, structured outputs, and error behavior your application needs.
Why keep the model ID in configuration?
It lets you test, roll back, and change models without scattering provider-specific IDs throughout the codebase.
Choose a GPT-5.6 model
Open Model Plaza to confirm the model ID, API key access, availability, and current price.